So by the time they are 12 years old?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 2:27 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: somebody help me on this?
> 
> My belief is that life begins when it can be sustained outside the womb,
> even with heroic measures. I don't support abortion as birth control. I
> support educating people (including teenagers) in birth control, and the
> results of not being careful.
> 
> That being said, IMO an embryo is a potential human, as much as it is a
> potential source of stem cells.
> 
> Scott Stewart
> 
> ColdFusion Developer/Administrator
> 
> GlobalNet Services, Inc.
> 
> www.gnsi.com
> 
> 301-770-9610 x358 (Voice)
> 
> 301-770-9611          (Fax)
> 
> 
> 
> The information contained in this message may be privileged, confidential,
> and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, or any employee or agent responsible for delivering
> this
> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify
> us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
> computer.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 5:15 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: somebody help me on this?
> 
> My grandfather had his leg cut off due to diabities before he died. If
> that
> could be cured by a few embryos that may or may not even develop into
> life,
> then I'm all for it. We're talking cells, not people.
> 
> And if this is a religious issue it show pure lack of faith in God. If you
> have faith that God has a plan and will provide for specific people to be
> born, then you have no control over it and can use as many embrios as you
> want. God will make sure the right ones become people and the wrong ones
> become stem cells.
> 
> 
> > No. The fear is scientist will create life in vitro for the purpose of
> > destroying it to get the cells. They say there are 400,000 frozen
> > embryos, already fertilized, in storage. Bush wants to let people
> > adopt them. So far, under the snowflake program, 81 children have been
> > adopted and are now alive. That's such a tiny fraction of the 400k
> > that it's not realistic. The problem is the frozen discarded embryos
> > might not suffice, so they might need to create fresh ones. They might
> > also want to create embryos with known genetic defects so they can
> > understand it better and cure that defect. I'm not even sure if I have
> > a problem with that but it does sound creepy and I can understand why
> > people think it's morally wrong.
> >
> > On 7/21/06, Dana Tierney wrote:
> >> I have not said anything about stem cells because I've been busy and
> >> because, to be honest, I did not exect any kind of legislation to ever
> >> pass to get to the veto stage.
> >>
> >> But here we are, andmy question is -- the opposition to stem cell
> >> research comes from some secret conviction that if it is allowed women
> >> will deliberately conceive so they can sell the fetuses? Is that it?
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211636
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to