>From a strict viewpoint, yes; which is why some suggest they need to be brought to term in surrogates.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 12:03 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: somebody help me on this? > > > Nick wrote: > > Yes, however the law doesn't support that. > > > > Wouldn't that be make Bush's policy murder then? That is, isn't he > allowing viable embryos to be destroyed for research - or at least not > brought to term which would be the same thing, right? > > Wouldn't the position be that all of these fertilized embryos need to > be brought to term (not used for research) or their parents are guilty > of murder (even if that's not the law)? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211674 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
