> gMoney wrote: > Ok, I know I live in Kansas...that's hitting below the belt :) >
I hereby apologize and retract said comment :) > This photo is proof of nothing, but the photographer was fired by Reuters, > so their investigation showed some sort of impropriety on the part of the > photographer. That is proof of something, isn't it? > Not of a media conspiracy - if anything it's proof of the lack of one being that they fired the guy (but actually I think that was over the smoking Beirut pictures and not over the staged one, but maybe it's the same guy, I dunno. If so all that much more strong that we've got a rogue and not a conspiracy.) There's an old saying that every apprentice engineer hears (at least there was): when a businessman or journalist fecks up, few will know and even less will care. When you feck up there'll be a smoking hole or monument of debris to herald your failure. Many will know and all will care. Don't feck up. Ever. I guess my point is to the "media conspiracy." I don't see one. Sure there are mistakes, sure there are bad journalists, but there's no conspiracy that I can see. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212905 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
