Gruss, it's *probably* right. It probably was Christians. But it doesn't take "fundamental" Christians to complain, or Christians at all. The fallacy in this argument is that it was presented as some sort of damning evidence.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <cf-community@houseoffusion.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 7:52 PM Subject: Re: Fear of religious fanatics >> Chesty wrote: >> There aren't any facts other than a woman got fired because parents >> complained. I don't make any assumptions about what happened. You made >> an >> opinionated assertion and stated it as fact. >> > > Yes but the key fact is the nude woman. If there's one thing that > gets Americans upset, it's sex or anything that might indicate sex. > Just look at the Clinton's Sexgate. > > Why are Americans so afraid of sex and naked people? Puritan and > religious taboos. Now in Texas, what's the primary religion? > Christianity. And Christians hate sex symbols - or anything that can > be construed as a sex symbol. > > So it would follow that it was a Christian family that was disturbed > by this Museum piece. That's an assumption, but a logical and fair > assumption based on facts. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216258 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
