Hold on...You don't know that these same people would allow movies like that in their house, especially to children. The problem isn't what these people, whoever they are, do or don't allow. The problem is that it's not anyone else's right to provide children with the opportunity to see or hear things that are definitely questionable. You may not mind it, the teacher may not, but the parents apparently did and made themselves heard. That's a 1st amendment right. This isn't a religion issue, it's a free-speech issue. It's also about parental rights. However you feel about tits, it's not your place to provide them for other's children.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <cf-community@houseoffusion.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:22 PM Subject: Re: Fear of religious fanatics >> Chesty wrote: >> The >> fallacy in this argument is that it was presented as some sort of damning >> evidence. >> > > Yeah, I'm just pointing out that while the evidence isn't damning it's > certainly indicitive. > > I'm also always amazed that it seems to be ok to show a bullet slowing > traveling into someone's brain or a serial killer strangling someone, > but show some tits and it's time to riot. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216260 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
