On 10/26/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But the reason to create an embryo using SCNT as opposed to just using
> any leftover embryo is so the cells would match the donor and no
> rejection.
> So I'm guessing it's a loophole. As long as you say you also want to
> have a child it's a go.


Rejection is only an issue if you are seeking pregnancy. That's important
for a fertility clinic, but the stem cell researcher wouldn't care. Right?

Where's Larry when you need him?


>From his most recent posts, I think he might be in hell....aka patchworking
someone else's spaghetti code.

So a cloned human (SCNT) Blastocyst can be used for research if it is
> also used for fertility treatment, but if can't be implanted in a
> person.
> So technically SCNT can't be used for stem cell research ever. I'm
> getting a headache.


I dunno man. Ex-vitro fertilization already does this. The difference is,
the eggs are reimplanted with the hope of uteral attachment and pregnancy.
Stem cell folks say take these eggs and instead harvest the stem cells for
research. So the SCNT can be used for stem cell research, but you can't take
the fertilized eggs and run off and create people with them.....unless you
put em back in the mom?? *head scratch*


On 10/26/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Think it just means you can't say "Hey, i want to do some stem cell
> > research, lets create some embryos!" The embryos must have been created
> for
> > the purpose of human infertility, which is an abundant practice today.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:218504
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to