> Then how would you explain that a a grand jury, a jury, and multiple > Bush-appointed judges ALL have said that Libbey is "overwhelmingly > guilty"? > > How do you explain that?
Simple: He may be guilty but he's not the only one that is guilty... and some of those that are guilty (or at the very least should be subjected to a multi-year grand jury investigation) include Plame, Armitage and Fitzgerald. Regardless of party affiliation. See, the case isn't, "Libby is innocent and these others are guilty," it's, "these guys all lied to a grand jury and should face the same charges and sentence as Libby." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe® Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:237707 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
