he seems to delight in proving that so and so is morally reprehensible. Since I don't know or care who most of the people he is talking about are, I find these snickering little comments pretty irrelevant.
My position is simple. I oppose Desert Rock (a local example) because of what it will do to air quality. If what it will do to air also increases global warming, all the more reason to oppose what is a very bad idea to begin with. If the pollution it will cause is irrelevant to global warming, see above. It's still a very bad idea. I likes me some breathable air. Dana On 8/10/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This discussion isn't going anywhere because none of us are even discussing > the same thing. > > Sam keeps pointing out that the hysteria surrounding GW is probably trumped > up.....and the rest of us pretty much agree. > > Then we argue that the science seems sound and you can't deny that GW IS > occurring. Instead of disputing that, Sam goes back to the hype. I asked him > why he doesn't believe the scientists, and he comments on how their findings > are hyped and exploited by the Al Gore's of the world. > > It's been a frustrating conversation. > > On 8/10/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I asked if there was any point in even looking. And you found one > > article? Wow. As I was saying... I'm kinda busy this week. > > > > > -- > Her CD changer is full of singers who are mad at their cat. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade to ColdFusion 8 and integrate with Adobe Flex http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:239927 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
