Like I said in my post, I disagreed with the law. I was just using an example I experienced at a restaurant here in Baton Rouge. I did reciprocate to the lady in question by letting her see what I ate, a second time.
>Uhmm, no Russ you don't, because you can eat somewhere else. Legislating >fashion is like legislating morality, it doesn't work, and creates >unnecessary bottlenecks in the courts. > >This same thing got shot down in Richmond, Virginia, because enough people >saw the stupidity and wastefulness of the legislation. > >What next, do we legislate what slogans people can wear on their T-Shirts, >or people can only wear specific brands? > > >-- >Scott Stewart >ColdFusion Developer > >SSTWebworks >4405 Oakshyre Way >Raleigh, NC. 27616 >(703) 220-2835 > >http://www.sstwebworks.com >http://www.linkedin.com/in/sstwebworks > > >Fuck you - only the by-line read New Orleans. The actual cities with bans >are in north Louisiana. So I don't hve a constitutional right not to see >some 300 pound woman showing 6 inches of thong back and ass while I'm trying >to eat? > >Plus, where in the constitution does it ban local governments from setting >LOCAL indecent exposure standards. > >BTW, I disagree with the law, but sympathize with the aims. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Enterprise web applications, build robust, secure scalable apps today - Try it now ColdFusion Today ColdFusion 8 beta - Build next generation apps Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:241742 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
