well now *that's* a good point. On 11/16/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That sounds like a reasonable solution. I can appreciate that there > were men back in the day that felt it was wrong to take a life; giving > them the option of being medics is a decent solution. What I don't > understand is that people today, in an all volunteer armed forces, > would sign up and THEN decide to be conscientious objectors. > > On Nov 16, 2007 12:06 PM, Scott S wrote: > > When my pop was in the Army (post WWII) "conscience objectors" became > > medics, and were not required to carry firearms. > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:246596 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
