I don't think a +/- margin error makes sense when we are talking about delegate votes. Each "area" (don't know what those are called) in NH tallies it's votes to determine which candidate receives the delegate vote for that area (done for each party separately, of course). The delegate votes are then tallied for each candidate.
There is no statistical margin, there is just X number of delegates for you, Y for you, Z for you, etc. Someone please correct me if I have this process wrong in my mind...... On Jan 9, 2008 9:37 AM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Really? > The lead isn't made statistically irrelevant or anything like that > because of the +/- error margin thingy? > > On Jan 9, 2008 11:19 AM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It's says that he's winning so far. In NH, with the 2% difference, > > they split the delegates, 9 each. With his Iowa win at a higher > > margin, Obama is thus far in the lead. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:250283 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
