Dieblod :) On Jan 9, 2008 9:18 AM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > gMoney wrote: > > Someone please correct me if I have this process wrong in my mind...... > > > > I ain't no expert but as I understand it, X% gets you X delegates > which means everyone above a certain threshold got delegates including > Edwards. The "wins" are really more of a measure of momentum and/or > regional snapshots than true wins as it's NOT winner take all. > > So, as it stands, Obama is ahead of Clinton with Delegates. We'll see > what happens in Nevada and South Carolina and then, of course, on > Tsunami Tuesday on Feb 5th. > > As to the polls that predicted an Obama win there are one 2 possibilities: > > (1.) People lied, and looks like maybe 13% of them did, or > (2.) The exit polling calculations are wrong. > > It can't be #2, but the McCain number came back perfectly so that > means that people probably lied about who they voted for. Maybe > because they were with their spouse, maybe because they felt guilty, > who knows.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:250295 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
