> But, as much as Mr. Clinton has a good majority of fans and backers, I do > not think it would be in Hillary's best interest to tag hubby as VP because > it might sway some people who were on the fence between her and another > candidate,
I didn't say it'd be a smart thing for her to do, I said it makes sense that she would because of how much campaigning *he* has been doing. > I mean why wouldn't she select Obama or Edwards? Isn't that the move to > make? Or am I way off base here ... Edwards doesn't earn her any more votes than she can get with Obama or hubby. Obama might be a candidate but she'd have to Gore-ify him like Bill did in the 90's. I don't think she could put up with Obama's wife either. As far as if she is going to get the nod, take a look at http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D which brings in the "superdelegate" count. Hill's ahead of Obama by over 100 delegates. That's the Clinton machine cashing in on favors and name. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:251824 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
