In case you missed it, that was sarcasm. My point is that any candidate should not be judged on one singular issue. As Gruss pointed out all of the candidates have their pros and cons. I am not judging Obama on just the religious issue. My concern is he has no experience, and although there are times when a less experienced person could be a welcome change in certain instances, I am not willing to gamble that idea on the future leader of this country. In this instance, I am going to have to go with who is more experienced. Yes Obama is a good speaker and as Michael pointed out he has a way of inspiring the masses, but charm and charisma can only take you so far. In my opinion, Obama does not have enough experience in politics to take on such a monumental task, especially when we are still at war. I would prefer a candidate that not only has military experience, but has actually been to combat. Someone like that knows what is at stake, and that person knows that regardless of the circumstances of why we are at war, we are at war none the less and they will want to see it through. Surrendering to me is an affront to the men and women who have bravely volunteered to not only serve, but to serve knowing that they are going to war.
Dana wrote: > ..... > > your post speaks for itself. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257248 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
