so your problem with the man is that he is not willing to prolong a war? Even though nobody can articulate a reason for waging it?
On 3/23/08, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In case you missed it, that was sarcasm. My point is that any candidate > should not be judged on one singular issue. As Gruss pointed out all of > the candidates have their pros and cons. I am not judging Obama on just > the religious issue. My concern is he has no experience, and although > there are times when a less experienced person could be a welcome change > in certain instances, I am not willing to gamble that idea on the future > leader of this country. In this instance, I am going to have to go with > who is more experienced. Yes Obama is a good speaker and as Michael > pointed out he has a way of inspiring the masses, but charm and charisma > can only take you so far. In my opinion, Obama does not have enough > experience in politics to take on such a monumental task, especially > when we are still at war. I would prefer a candidate that not only has > military experience, but has actually been to combat. Someone like that > knows what is at stake, and that person knows that regardless of the > circumstances of why we are at war, we are at war none the less and they > will want to see it through. Surrendering to me is an affront to the men > and women who have bravely volunteered to not only serve, but to serve > knowing that they are going to war. > > Dana wrote: > > ..... > > > > your post speaks for itself. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257249 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
