>> Bothers me as much as the lies that Biden and Obama and McCain have
>> told in this race for the oval office.
>
> This is on a different level.  Those are subjective characterizations
> or, at worse, lies of omission.

Lies of omission?  There are some whoppers that have come out of
everyone's mouths - my favorite is when Obama claimed that he thought
Ayres was, "rehabilitated."  Biden's are worse, IMO, misrepresenting
votes, bills and statements made.  McCain's got a few in there as
well.

> In this case an investigative body found her in direct violation of
> the state ethics act, yet she looks into the camera and says they
> didn't.

I read the actual findings somewhat differently.  She *was* justified
at her firing of Monegan (the head of the AK state police) but that
the "abuse of power" came from her trying to get her former
brother-in-law fired.  In addition, no legal charges can stem from the
findings of the probe so she has been cleared of any legal
wrong-doing.

Breaking a state ethics rule is kinda like shutting off the lights in
the House chamber while your opponents are trying to debate an energy
bill.

Hatton

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:274152
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to