On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Judah wrote: > >> >> Did it not occur to McCain that he might have a problem having a VP >> embroiled in an ethics investigation right before the election? >> > > McCain looked at the issue and was satisfied.
Good for him. Then neither he nor his supporters should have any problems with the completion of an investigation already underway. Like I said, we can disagree on the content of the report. And we do. That's fine. But this wasn't an investigation sprung on Palin by a Democratic congress after she was chosen VP or something. It wasn't a rush job pushed up from a next summer completion date in order to get sprung right before the election. In short, the process was not a hachet job and it is duplicitous to suggest otherwise. You make a case for why the report is flawed. I'd be happy to see McCain/Palin make that case and then others could try and rebut the arguments. That's great and how these things should work. What I don't like seeing is Palin saying "the report says this" when it explicitly says the opposite. I'm guessing at this point that the populace doesn't really give a crap about the report though. Palin's positive/negatives were already pretty low and everyone is pretty much entirely economy focused at this point. Another footnote in the history of an already rancorous campaign. Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:274184 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
