> RoMunn wrote: > > hahahahahahaha > > that's a good one. it's like saying we'll now have a choice - secret > balloting, or having our nuts stepped on by large men in overalls. nice one. >
So the translation of this is that you don't understand what you're talking about. I'll explain it for you (as usual): (1.) The bill doesnt remove the secret ballot option from the National Labor Relations Act. So not sure what you're whining about there. (2.) Currently an employer can force a secret ballot election even if a majority of workers want to unionize. The bill creates the option to unionize as soon as the majority has the cards to prove it - OR - the employees can have a secret ballot. Their choice. Personally I think unions suck so I could give a shit. The odd this is, I still don't understand how this in any way relates to the Constitution. What's the deal there ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:292832 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
