It is a tiny amount and probably didn't get to anyone other than the
warlords, but it was still a financial transaction between a party in
(partial) rule of the area and a party wishing to dump waste. This fact is
not mentioned in the article and should be. It is not a cut and dry "the
west is the only ones at fault" thing.

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> 80 million is nothing when it comes to environmental cleanup. Did that
> money get to the people affected, ev
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Michael Dinowitz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I notice that the payment to Somali warlords of $80 million in return for
> > the 'rights' to dump the waste was not mentioned. As much as the article
> > makes it out to be the evil west vs. the noble suffering Somalis, the
> truth
> > of the situation if far from that simple.
> > On the other hand, it is not a repeat of the Muslim piracy of the Barbary
> > coast, no matter how some sites want to make it.
> >
> > Oh, and "everybody agrees" is not true either, as everyone can tell you.
> :)
>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294810
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to