Not from what I have read about who was and are there. I took from who was there, how they got there, and what we were accusing them of (not "charges" per se, just "he is bad"), that it became a place to send those people we didn't know what else to do with.
Including a number of people that were "sold" to us for bounty, with no real idea of what they did. Captured in a dozen different countries (not just countries we are "at war" with or in. On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM, G Money <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Jerry Johnson <jmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The problem _I_ had with Guantanamo is that it was a "throw em all in >> the same pot" plan, with no distinguishing between where they were >> captured, what they were doing, and no possible resolution, since it >> wasn't in a war zone, so the "war" could never end. > > > Are you sure that's accurate? I thought Gitmo only contained a certain set > of criminals, who met a fairly specific requirement? > > I thought where they were captured, and what they were doing, was most > definitely considered before they were shipped to gitmo? > > -- > When the Jazzman's testifyin' > A faithless man believes > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294888 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
