I don't recall ever commenting at all on Bush and science, but this is hardly the first time you've attributed stuff to me that I never said.
And I defy you find any comment I have made in this discussion that excuses the skewing of data by either side. Ass. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All those years of claiming Bush was controlling science and now you > have proof it was the other side and yet you excuse it. > > Shame shame. > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Perhaps that is all it was, but what it has become the red herring >> with which the opponents can derail the entire dialogue on climate >> change. Someone obviously did not think this through before taking >> action, so it has become the climate research equivalent of Clinton's >> blow job ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308981 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
