Completely out of content. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does this statement ring a bell? > >>> Perhaps that is all it was, but what it has become the red herring >>> with which the opponents can derail the entire dialogue on climate >>> change. > > Or by calling the exposure a red herring you really meant tuna? > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I don't recall ever commenting at all on Bush and science, but this is >> hardly the first time you've attributed stuff to me that I never said. >> >> And I defy you find any comment I have made in this discussion that >> excuses the skewing of data by either side. >> >> Ass. >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> All those years of claiming Bush was controlling science and now you >>> have proof it was the other side and yet you excuse it. >>> >>> Shame shame. >>> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308985 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
