Um isn't that what the National Science Foundation supposed to do? And
have been doing such. For instance:
http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=114961

And there are quite a few other reports issued by the NSF on this area.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Scott Stewart
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Jerry,
>
> What you've said makes a lot of sense. I think both sides have been misled.
> I'm not a doomsayer, and I don't really embrace the cult of Al Gore. I also
> don't embrace the thoughts of those who dismiss global warming, simply
> because it affects their bottom line, or because it's what their political
> party beats into their brain.
>
> My question is: Is there a body willing to take on a non partisan research
> effort, (the Smithsonian Institution?, National Geographic Society?, MIT,
> Stanford?)
>
> Currently neither side has really provided definitive answers except
> "proceed with extreme caution".
>
> Man has destroyed large parts of our planet, exterminated countless species,
>
> (Look at what was done to the Chesapeake Bay, and the Great Lakes) To think
> that we *couldn't* have a disastrous effect on the atmosphere is foolish.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:41 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: ah ha ha ha ha ha!!!
>
>
> "I can understand that, but the attitude that is often portrayed is one that
> puts all the blame for the global climate change squarely on the shoulders
> of man. That is what I have issues with."
>
> Exactly.
>
> "I hear that a lot from people who don't think we have an impact on the
> earth, but I don't see it portrayed by people who do."
>
> Of course humans have an impact on the earth. Look at the animals that have
> been made extinct by humans.  There are many other similar things.
>
> However, there is not enough evidence to say that man has contributed to
> global warming.  The evidence that has been used is hopelessly tainted by
> the researchers who were pushing an agenda.  The whole investigation needs
> to start again with the original, unmodified data immediately available so
> verification can be done expediently by independent researchers.  If global
> warming is the big crisis that its proponents make it out to be, they should
> be willing to do things the right way in order to make a convincing
> argument.  If the evidence does not point to man made global warming, so
> much the better.
>
> I have said this before, and I'll say it again:  just because someone is not
> part of the cult of man-made global warming doesn't mean that person can't
> believe in environmental responsibility.  However, I am not into the
> government or the green police forcing their version of responsibility on
> anyone.  I believe people should do the right thing because it is prudent,
> logical, and morally sound.  People should not pollute because it is wrong.
> People shouldn't drive gas hogs when they aren't necessary.  People should
> use energy efficient electronics when feasible (that doesn't mean ditch all
> you stuff now, but replace it with better stuff as necessary). People should
> turn off the lights when they are in a room.  So on and so on.  Sort along
> the same line as people should not park in handicap if they aren't (even if
> their cousin gave them a placard) just because they shouldn't.
>
> In the end, the global warming debate as it stands now is buried under its
> own weight of corruption and lies.  I lot of people believed in it and are
> now in denial.  They have a hard time believing they were beguiled by
> charlatans like Al Gore.  People can move on though.  At some point in their
> lives, most people believed in Santa Clause.  Through mounting evidence or a
> direct intervention by someone else, they found out the truth.  A traumatic
> time for some I'm sure.  They still manage to move on.  Time to move on.
>
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312132
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to