On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > Where is the better explanation of the data? I have yet to hear any > scientifically valid explanation of the mean yearly temperature rise.
Jones is the one responsible for the data you refer to. As per JB's article he's now admitted your statement is false: Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no statistically significant warming. > or the increases in early migrations of most migratory birds in North America > > Or the northerly increase in the range of a variety of tropical > species. With a commensurate increase in the northernmost ranges for > temperate climate species. > > There is just far too much evidence from all sorts of different > streams of data that all point to the same thing, increasing mean > global temperature. > > There as not been a valid competing theory or model so far put out by > the climate deniers that offer a better explanation of the data than > the current models. > > One citation in a peer reviewed climatology journal is all that's needed. > > We're waiting... > > BTW if you cannot produce such what are we to conclude? that the > so-called skeptics (most of whom are funded by industry special > interests) cannot provide a better explanation for the data than the > current consensus model. So what do the climate change deniers do, > they try to discredit the scientific community as a whole. In other > words its better to trust the stereotype of the lone scientist who > bucks the establishment. It fits within their Randian ethos. It makes > more sense to trust the "little guy"the maverick scientistthan the > scientific establishment. > > "History tells us that a lot of ground-breaking discoveries are made > by mavericks who don't follow the mainstream," says Laidler. "What is > often left out is that most of the mavericks are just plain wrong. > They laughed at Galileo and Edison, but they also laughed at Bozo the > Clown and Don Knot ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312150 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
