And what examples of irreducible complexity would you like to cite? Such a laughable term. I remember when the ID crowd was citing the Eye. After all, they said, what good is part of an eye? Except, of course, part of an eye is quite useful. Being able to distinguish shadows of incoming predators, even if they can't really "see" shapes, presents an advantage over those who cannot see at all. And there are many examples of intermediate forms of eyes in the animal kingdom. Yet even with these obvious examples, I still see the eye presented as an example of "irreducible complexity".
Judah On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Kris Sisk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Big Bang as we know it: The universe started from nothing. There was an > explosion and in 1/10000 of a second it had already expanded to thousnds of > light years. > > Biblical account: God said let there be light and there was. > > Why do people think those are incompatible? Seriously? The Big Bang sound > like someone flipping on a light switch to me. > > As for evolution vs. creationism...Well they aren't exactly incompatible > either, depending on your view of creationism. Given that random chance > evolution has been disproven a couple of times over (irreducible complexity, > look it up before you flame) the only remaining possibility is some sort of > intelligent designer. That doesn't neccesarily mean that said designer didn't > use evolution to get to us. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315564 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
