http://www.ideacenter.org/about/mission_beliefs.php
We recognize that investigations on origins raises questions that are both religious and scientific in nature, but we are careful not to mix scientific claims with religious claims, and recognize that the two are distinct and different, though complementary to one-another. On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:37 PM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I believe the majority of believers go for Theistic evolution >> >> Young Earth creationism: >> Earth is 6,000 years old >> >> Old Earth creationism >> Earth is billions of years old but doesn't believe evolution >> >> Theistic evolution >> believe all the science but think god designed evolution >> >> Intelligent design >> same as Theistic evolution >> > > Close, but I don't think that's quite right. The rallying cry for > Intelligent Design is "Teach the Controversy!"...which suggests a scientific > controversy involving evolution.....a controversy which simply does not > exist. > > I don't think intelligent designers "believe all the science". In fact, they > don't even understand the basic concepts of what it means to be a science ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315598 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
