typical cherry picking of the evidence. It serves his cause to engage in creative editing.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://www.ideacenter.org/about/mission_beliefs.php >> >> We recognize that investigations on origins raises questions that are >> both religious and scientific in nature, but we are careful not to mix >> scientific claims with religious claims, and recognize that the two >> are distinct and different, though complementary to one-another. >> > > Heh heh..you left off the sentence that appears right before that: > > Like any organization, IDEA itself is not without its own biases. Our > mission statement plainly says that "[a]t the heart of our advocacy is to > promote intelligent design theory purely on its scientific merits." > > Intelligent Design HAS NO SCIENTIFIC MERITS...and that renders all that > comes after...pointless. > > -- > Everybody knows the war is over > Everybody knows the good guys lost > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315605 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
