It may be but (I think) it's still coming through on a specific port, I worked at an ISP a long time ago and we blocked ports constantly to cut down on excessive traffic...
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:18 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <chumph...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That was my question as well - I thought any VPN tunnel, especially > IPSec / IKE ones were effectively was akin to running it's own straw > through the pipe. > > Until Later! > C. Hatton Humphrey > http://www.eastcoastconservative.com > > No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. > > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> based on what I remember ( or don't remember) from my networking days, >> isn't the traffic sent over a VPN encrypted? If so, how would an ISOP >> know what traffic is actually being sent? >> >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <chumph...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I've got a doozie of an issue that is a continuation from the VPN >>> tunnel problem that Dana helped me with. I set up the hardware for a >>> VPN (IPSec/IKE) that was completely tested and working in-house. I >>> have two different network connections internally and mimicked the >>> setup that our remote employee would have (Modem -> Home Router -> Our >>> Router -> Wireless Bridge -> PoE Block -> VoIP Phone). Everything >>> worked swimmingly. >>> >>> She has it all set up at her house now and everything lights up BUT >>> the phone. I can actually access the web setup interface on the >>> router we sent her from my desktop (192.168.2.153 -> 192.168.129.1) >>> and actually ping the phone itself! >>> >>> For brand names, we sent her a Cisco/Linksys WRV210 wireless router, a >>> Cisco/Linksys WET610N wireless bridge, a Shoretel PoE Block and a >>> ShoreTel IP115 VoIP phone. She is plugging it in to her home router >>> which is also providing wireless access for 2 other computers. I >>> tested this exact configuration in the office with the only difference >>> being the final internet connection. I was running on a dynamic T >>> that we're going to be putting in to use soon, she's plugging in to a >>> home cablemodem that's actually providing more bandwidth than the T. >>> >>> I'm wondering if it's a latency issue at this point or if, in fact, >>> the ISP can deny certain kinds of traffic even though it is going >>> through a hardware VPN. >>> >>> Any thoughts? I have very little control over the phone configuration >>> itself - all I can set are some settings that I don't truly understand >>> - 802.1Q tagging (currently off, for VLan I think), 802.1x enable >>> (which I think is a security measure, also off) and LLDP enable >>> (currently on). As I said I do have access to the remote router which >>> makes changing the setup there an easier task than walking her through >>> it. >>> >>> Until Later! >>> C. Hatton Humphrey >>> http://www.eastcoastconservative.com >>> >>> No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large >>> number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. >>> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316089 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
