I'm confused by this statement. Who has said "since I can't explain it, it can't be true?" That's not a scientific outlook at all. It resembles religious dogma more than anything.
On Apr 16, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Kris Sisk wrote: > > Besides the other approach suggests that if something can't be explained then > it can't be true. That's no better than saying everything's magic because > there are things, even without taking any potential supernatural influence > out of the equation, that mankind will never understand. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316137 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
