I agree.  If it were possible, I'd love to see Augusta give him an
invite anyway - assuming he does not qualify in other ways.

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Ras Tafari <rastaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> and it will come back in spades.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here are some other things, besides the $400,000, that Davis gave up
>> when he called the penalty on himself.
>>
>> a 2011 Masters Invite
>> a 2-year exemption to the PGA Tour
>> an invite to the 2011 SBS Tournament just to start.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Ras Tafari <rastaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ahhhh, if ye are not golfers, ye'd not get "it"
>>>
>>> its about the integrity of the game, and we follow it strictly.
>>> there is only you, and you can go play by yourself, with no one
>>> watching, so without that integrity, there is nothing.
>>>
>>> now, probably what REALLY went through his mind...
>>> for each and every great shot out there, there is a SUPER slow motion
>>> camera that shows
>>> what happened, especially in a playoff, and especially when it was
>>> that tight, and that shot
>>> was THAT important.  had a rules official seen that happen, they COULD
>>> have called him on it
>>> AFTER the fact, and if he had signed his scorecard, he could then be
>>> disqualified from the tournament
>>> altogether.  same as hitting the wrong ball and not calling it on yourself,
>>> same as writing the wrong score on a scorecard, an signing it.
>>> anyway, he was ACTUALLY
>>> very smart in doing this.  in doing this he ensured he would win
>>> money.  if he was DQ'd, he'd not make
>>> a dime.  so, it was either call it on myself, deal with the higher
>>> score, and move on, OR, not call it myself
>>> and run the risk of DQ and ZERO dollars.  id rather lose 400k, than
>>> not make $615,600.00
>>>
>>> w0rd.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> i think he was very honorable, and very smart.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jerry Johnson <jmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It isn't stupidly honest, it is scrupulously honest.
>>>>
>>>> No, it didn't affect his play.
>>>> Yes, it WAS a rules violation.
>>>> Yes, he was on the honor system.
>>>> No, probably no one would have called him on it.
>>>>
>>>> But, as many a person has said before, character is what you do when no one
>>>> is watching.
>>>>
>>>> In basketball, it isn't a player's job to self report a foul or a goaltend.
>>>> In football, it isn't a player's job to self report a penalty, or a fumble,
>>>> or a dropped ball.
>>>> In baseball, it isn't a player's job to self report to running outside the
>>>> bases, or a dropped ball.
>>>>
>>>> In golf, it is all on the player to be honest. And even to err on the
>>>> "maybe" side of a mistake.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that was a little ridiculous.
>>>>> The reed didn't affect his play, and therefore it was totally
>>>>> unnecessary. It also was not intentional.
>>>>> It is possible to be stupidly honest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Johnson was a better example of this type of honesty in my view.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316316
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to