That could be...but does that apply to the specific emails that were sent?
I don't know the particulars of Alaska's law, but most state laws do
prohibit it...as does federal law for federal officials...hence all the
ruckus during the Bush administration for the shady crap they did with
private email and "losing" emails. Again, this is done for securioty reasons
and for stuff like FOIA.  Personally...I think any government business
should be prohibited outside of government emails just for the reason we are
seeing here if anything.  I bet the security policies on her state email
addy were a bit stricter ;-)

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:46 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!


Hey, didn't I use that line on you last week:)

But you're wrong:
McKay concluded, among other things, that "not all emails relating to
state business are necessarily public records, and that the "use of
private email accounts to conduct state business does not -- in and of
itself -- violate state law."

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Eric Roberts
<ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> What makes it a crime is that she is supposed to only use government email
> for government business and not use personal email for government
business.
> Maybe I should type slower for you Sam?
>



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317267
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to