I suppose, if he is running for animal catcher... -----Original Message----- From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 6:19 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: FactCheck.org Campaign Whoppers of 2010
If your opponent had pertinent information about their background, say Michael Vick runs for office and we think it is important to mention that he has an animal abuse background, should the opponent not get to mention that? Would you leave it to outside groups but not allow the candidate? Should no one be allowed to say negative things but only positive ones? Judah On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think that you should be banned from mentioning your opponent in any > ads. I don't want to know about them, I wan tot know about you. > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I've been advocating that for years. >> >> If a politician lies while campaigning, they should be removed from >> the ballot. All campaign ads should be vetted for truth and absence >> of spin and disinformation before being allowed on the air. >> >> If they lie after elected, they should be removed from office. >> >> Pure and simple. >> >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Jerry Johnson <jmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> Then turn those folk loose on politicians. Anyone found lying would be >>> instantly disqualified from office. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330521 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
