They were legally serving a warrant and performing their sworn duty. So you think that if a person is holding a firearms when he's about to be arrested the law enforcement officers should not protect themselves. I am sure that many street cops will agree with you in that case.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "If they were illegally selling firearms, actively resisting arrest, > shooting at law enforcement officers etc then it wouldn't matter if they > were neo-nazis, republicans, democratic party members, Rotarians or Free > Masons." > > Regardless of whether the government instigated the whole episode. Right > Larry? > > Unarmed relatives deserve to be shot too. Right Larry? > > Never mind; we know your answer: Government is always right. > > J > > - > > The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as > a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government - Thomas > Jefferson > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:331376 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
