San Francisco is one of the top tourist destinations on earth, but people who come to San Francisco aren't coming here to eat at McDonalds.
Doubtful that McDonalds will appeal the legislation as they didn't put any money into opposing it. On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "See my earlier message about the legislation out here. San > Francisco doesn't care what the rest of the nation things." > > No doubt. > > However, there are repercussions that could be out of SF's hands. While SF > might not care what the rest of the nation thinks, I bet SF likes money. > People might start actually stop going to SF for vacations since they don't > want to support the nanny regime. I imagine that SF makes quite a bit on > tourism. > > Then there are the cost of potential lawsuits by McDonalds. If SF is > anything like the rest of CA, it doesn't have the money to fight a prolonged > legal battle. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:331303 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
