Nor is it accepted ;-) -----Original Message----- From: Greg Morphis [mailto:gmorp...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 13:10 To: cf-community Subject: Re: Japan
Those were the first 2 examples off the top of my head. And just shows how unexpected your theory is.. Look on Nasa.gov.. and again, nothing about solar flares causing earth quakes.. It's because it's not excepted. On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Michael Dinowitz <mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: > > Excuse me while I die laughing at that response. It is more perfect > than perfect. :) > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Yeah, cause Wikipedia and eHow are so much more accurate than the >> peer reviewed scientific abstracts from Harvard in the links Sam posted. >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Greg Morphis <gmorp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > IF it was a given that solar flares had an impact on earthquakes >> > when I went to wikipedia or ehow.com or anywhere that had research >> > on solar flares it would state that they do, how and why they do.. but no.. >> > when you go to a website and query solar flares and impact you get >> > something like >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335148 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
