LOL thank you.. this whole topic is eating my day away.. On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Eric Roberts <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > Nor is it accepted ;-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Morphis [mailto:gmorp...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 13:10 > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Japan > > > Those were the first 2 examples off the top of my head. > And just shows how unexpected your theory is.. > Look on Nasa.gov.. and again, nothing about solar flares causing earth > quakes.. It's because it's not excepted. > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Michael Dinowitz > <mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: >> >> Excuse me while I die laughing at that response. It is more perfect >> than perfect. :) >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Yeah, cause Wikipedia and eHow are so much more accurate than the >>> peer reviewed scientific abstracts from Harvard in the links Sam posted. >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Greg Morphis <gmorp...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> > >>> > IF it was a given that solar flares had an impact on earthquakes >>> > when I went to wikipedia or ehow.com or anywhere that had research >>> > on solar flares it would state that they do, how and why they do.. but > no.. >>> > when you go to a website and query solar flares and impact you get >>> > something like >>> >>> >> >> > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335149 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
