Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Right, and President Obama made the same claim about his children. > > So, my question to you is, why are you limiting this to Pailin.
I'll run through it again, but I'll de-identify it and maybe that will amplify the point: (1.) [VP candidate] brought [something] onto the campaign trail and made [something] part of the campaign rhetoric. (2.) There are reasonable questions, with quick easy answers, as to whether [something] is true. (3.) [VP candidate] has yet to provide the easy proof that [something] is true, and truth should be something we should all demand from our public candidates. (4.) Not only has [VP candidate] not provided the easy proof, he/she HAS provided complex second-hand documentation non-proof when first-hand documentation should be easily available. (5.) [VP candidate] continues to include him/herself as part of the political scene and is therefore still subject to questions about [something] Conclusion: If [VP candidate] regrets including [something] into his/her campaign then [VP candidate] should do the right thing for [something] and drop out of the scene thus taking the topic out of legitimate public discourse. It's not about the public's questions, it's about the candidate's answers. If the candidate doesn't like the questions, then the candidate shouldn't be in the public. Funny how personal accountability can be so easily forgotten. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:336692 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
