Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why are you limiting it to VP candidates?
No limits brutha! Updated to reflect suggested edit. >> I'll run through it again, but I'll de-identify it and maybe that will >> amplify the point: >> >> (1.) [candidate] brought [something] onto the campaign trail and >> made [something] part of the campaign rhetoric. >> >> (2.) There are reasonable questions, with quick easy answers, as to >> whether [something] is true. >> >> (3.) [candidate] has yet to provide the easy proof that [something] >> is true, and truth should be something we should all demand from our >> public candidates. >> >> (4.) Not only has [candidate] not provided the easy proof, he/she >> HAS provided complex second-hand documentation non-proof when >> first-hand documentation should be easily available. >> >> (5.) [candidate] continues to include him/herself as part of the >> political scene and is therefore still subject to questions about >> [something] >> >> Conclusion: >> >> If [candidate] regrets including [something] into his/her campaign >> then [candidate] should do the right thing for [something] and drop >> out of the scene thus taking the topic out of legitimate public >> discourse. >> >> It's not about the public's questions, it's about the candidate's >> answers. If the candidate doesn't like the questions, then the >> candidate shouldn't be in the public. >> >> Funny how personal accountability can be so easily forgotten. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:336704 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
