If it stopped with her being submissive to her spouse that would ok, as that is her right. The problem arises when she gets into a position of power and wants to use that power to tell me that I have to submissive to MY spouse - and also tell me what gender that spouse has to be, along with a whole host of other personal decisions she wants to legislate, including the right to be submissive in any way that might actually be fun.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Judah McAuley <ju...@wiredotter.com> wrote: > A number of more fundamentalist sects take a rather wide-ranging view > on the purview of a wife submitting to a husband. I do not know > whether Bachmann feels that a wife should be submissive to her husband > in all areas of their life or whether she means it solely within the > realm of their marriage and home life. Given her rather fundamentalist > views on other matters, I'd certainly be leery. But then again, all > the other fundamentalist views are why I wouldn't vote for her anyway, > so the particulars of this one area are largely moot for me. But just > because she says that women should be submissive to their husbands > doesn't necessarily mean that it would require her to potentially > compromise her position as an elected leader. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:339921 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
