It's stating how disastrous slavery was and it's impact to this date. Meaning it's highlighting the acceleration of the destruction of the family circuit starting from it's main culprit.
It does not, as Gel suggest, support or endorse slavery. . That's my A > B interpretation . On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Robert Munn <cfmuns...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> http://www.baratunde.com/blog/2011/7/8/michelle-bachmann-is-running-for-president-on-a-pro-slavery.html >> >> "Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet >> sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised >> by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an >> African-American baby born after the election of the USAs first >> African-American President." >> >> WTF?? really > > > I like the author's reference to the 'all-white, moralistic, American > Taliban'. The fact that American slavery is described as anything > other than a crime against humanity should disqualify this woman for > office. Two-parent household, my ass. What if the father was the slave > master, Michell ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:340097 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
