On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks.
>
> The porn reference is to protect our children from porn. That's already a
> law.
>
>
Bachmann's intent was probably to draw on the emotional appeal that slavery
has on people to make them think "wow, if something was better during
slavery than it is now for African Ameicans, how it is now must REALLY
suck".

But that won't be how the comment ultimately plays out. People like Gel, who
can't read, come up with their predictable reactions...and it just snowballs
from there. It's also quite likely that Jerry is right and her basic
contention isn't even correct to begin with. (luckily for her, it's
impossible to prove one way or the other).

Anyway......she's not running on a pro-slavery platform....but she probably
wasn't wise for bringing it up. And she's certainly not wise for supporting
the teaching of Creationism in a biology classroom :)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:340103
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to