Sounds like OpenID. I understand the point they are making, seeing the government as a neutral party who won't try to monetize a centralized id repository. I don't think that the value proposition is compelling enough to outweigh the civil liberty concerns though. I'd much rather see the government work to establish rigorous rules to protect privacy in all areas and then let the market establish the best solutions within a consumer-friendly regulatory environment.
Judah On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From CNET: ( http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20027800-281.html ) > > President Obama is planning to hand the U.S. Commerce Department authority > over a forthcoming cybersecurity effort to create an Internet ID for > Americans, a White House official said here today. > It's "the absolute perfect spot in the U.S. government" to centralize > efforts toward creating an "identity ecosystem" for the Internet, White > House Cybersecurity Coordinator Howard Schmidt said. > That news, first reported by CNET, effectively pushes the department to the > forefront of the issue, beating out other potential candidates, including > the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security. *The > move also is likely to please privacy and civil-liberties groups that have > raised concerns in the past over the dual roles of police and intelligence > agencies.* > > ... > > The Obama administration is currently drafting what it's calling the > National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace, which Locke said > will be released by the president in the next few months. > > ... > > "We are not talking about a national ID card," Locke said at the Stanford > event. "We are not talking about a government-controlled system. What we > are talking about is enhancing online security and privacy, and reducing > and perhaps even eliminating the need to memorize a dozen passwords, > through creation and use of more trusted digital identities." > > The Commerce Department will be setting up a national program office to > work on this project, Locke said. > > Details about the "trusted identity" project are remarkably scarce. Last > year's announcement referenced a possible forthcoming smart card or digital > certificate that would prove that online users are who they say they are. > These digital IDs would be offered to consumers by online vendors for > financial transactions. > > Schmidt stressed today that anonymity and pseudonymity will remain possible > on the Internet. "I don't have to get a credential, if I don't want to," he > said. There's no chance that "a centralized database will emerge," and "we > need the private sector to lead the implementation of this," he said. > > Jim Dempsey of the Center for Democracy and Technology, who spoke later at > the event, said any Internet ID must be created by the private sector--and > also voluntary and competitive. > > "The government cannot create that identity infrastructure," Dempsey said. > "If it tried to, it wouldn't be trusted." > > > > > > J > > - > 04-28-2003: I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and > you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We > should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and > disagree with any administration. - Hillary Clinton > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345269 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
