ya? What did she do that was corrupt, supposedly? I have only mildly been paying attention, but I thought the Republicans mainly thought she was a bitch, which... well, is an appellation that gets thrown around a lot, shall we say. Nonetheless. If there are credible grounds for corruption charges, she should be prosecuted. Otherwise people should shut up. The same applies to Boehner. If he has broken the law or legislative ethics rules, he should be prosecuted. If either skirted the law or the rules, then they should be exposed and removed from office. Otherwise the discussion should center on the facts.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There were actually several threads regarding Pelosi and her purported > corruption on the list last summer. No proof however, just > accusations as usual. I hate the whole concept of deciding guilt by > public opinion, whether the accused is Pelosi or Boehner. Due > Process, people. It's there for a reason. > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > you're in charge of finding a reason to start one, Sam. > > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> This is not about Pelosi. Remember the other thread about Pelosi's > >> corruption? Yeah, we had none. > >> > >> But it's nice to pretend you would care. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345552 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
