Forbes is talking about the second dump of emails. And not bringing criminal charges does not clear them of wrong doing. They are guilty if hell of lying and cheating. That's not science.
. On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > lets see given the choixe between the conclusions given by the Royal > Society and those of Forbes Magazine, an unbiased source no doubt, I > suspect that the choice is obvious to anyone with a bit of education > in the sciences. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345639 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
