Terms of coverage part way down the faq http://studentaffairs.georgetown.edu/insurance/faqs.html
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> it's the only thing approaching a valid argument on the other side of the >> issue, Sam. Valid argument, meet Sam, Sam meet valid argument. Some >> Catholic institutions say they should not have to pay to include >> contraceptives in coverage they are funding for their students and/or >> employees, since their religious beliefs say that contraception is wrong. >> Geez. You are making me do all the work here. Of course, it hasn't been >> demonstrated that it costs more to cover contraception, but hey, there's a >> First Amendment claim that isn't completely laughable. You're welcome. >> Anyway, that has all the makings of a supreme court case, eventually -- the >> right to not be messed with vs the right to believe that women do not have >> a right to not be messed with. Anyway, getting back to Fluke, none of that >> applies to student insurance at Georgetown if it is true that Georgetown >> doesn't subsidize it at all. On what basis would Georgetown have a First >> Amendment claim? PT is right. Either come off auto-pilot or STFU for a >> while, geez. >> > > >> >> >>> I don't see how you can construe a First Amendment right to dictate >> health >> >> care you aren't paying for. >> > >> > wa? >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347953 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm