On 3/4/2012 9:11 PM, Sam wrote: > I did read the transcript and I pointed out repeatedly why none of it > applies to the hearings. That is why it was not accepted as a valid > argument.
Then you didn't understand what you read. > > You on the other hand have not addressed any of the issues I've > discussed and throw your hands up in frustration because you lack a > valid point. That's because I don't know what you are talking about half the time and the other half is you making statements full of so much hyperbole that there isn't any real foundation for a logical argument. > > I've addressed all the statements in the testimony and will gladly > address others. Not in a sensible way or not without inflammatory coloring. > I thought maybe I could take a discussion with you seriously but I see > when you see you run out of logic you turn to insults. I am not insulting. I am telling you how I see things and how it is impossible to debate anything with you. There is no logic to run out of when the entire argument is illogical. You ability to mentally twist things is astounding though. I do have to give you credit for that. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347966 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
