On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ya it's not actually clear to me that a health insurance policy that > covers pregnancy but not contraception would be cheaper. It might not > be. > The insurance question is totally eclipsed by the cost of poverty to our society as a whole. The cost for a lifetime of contraception is WAY less than the cost to society that the cycle of poverty inflicts on this country. Anyone seen Freakonomics? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalized_abortion_and_crime_effect You can be totally against abortion, and the principles of this study would still apply to contraception (assuming you buy it). -Cameron ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:348110 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
