Especially when birth control is covered by the employee policy, claiming the religious freedom bullshit is rather disingenuous.
-----Original Message----- From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 5:47 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority? ya it's not actually clear to me that a health insurance policy that covers pregnancy but not contraception would be cheaper. It might not be. In any event, I suppose there's an argument to be made about religious freedom but if it were *me* deciding I'd say that the person whose body will be affected should be the one whose wishes should override in this sort of conflict. If Fluke is accurate in saying that Georgetown doesn't subsidize student insurance, I don't think they should be able to dictate its coverage. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Cameron Childress <camer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "What reason? Why she wants free contraception? Why they should have >> free contraception?" >> >> They are entitled. >> > > I hate entitlements more than anyone but entitlements be damned. Free > birth control for anyone who wants it may be the single best thing > this nation can do to battle the cycle of poverty. > > -Cameron > > ... > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:348143 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
