here is the cached page... http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=drones+used+by+police+departmetns&d=27023553397000195&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=8e681f6a,8d9f59b6
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Eric Roberts < ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > crap...404... > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Eric Roberts < > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > >> >> http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/04/21/2491063/aclu-concerned-about-seattle-police.html >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Eric Roberts < >> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> >>> I would have to look for the story, but i seem to recall hearing about >>> some police deopartmetns purchasing a drone. It may have been in ref to >>> immigaration enforcement. I will have to look to be sure. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> what data are we talking about exactly? Now there's a question. Is >>>> this an advanced version of google maps? With intercept capability? Or >>>> is there eavesdropping capability as well? >>>> >>>> Offhand, I'd choose corporate. I can tell Google to F* off if I so >>>> choose. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Border patrol wants to use them on the US Canadian border and I >>>> > believe they are testing unarmed drones, for surveillance only, on the >>>> > Mexican border. >>>> > >>>> > Here's a thought experiment, what's better, for the data to be only in >>>> > the hands of corporate or government hands, or available to anyone? >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> good question and I don't know. I wasn't even aware the Air Force was >>>> >> using drones in the US. I find the idea slightly chilling considering >>>> >> how they are used elsewhere. >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Cameron Childress < >>>> camer...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/05/09/1538217/us-air-force-can-accidentally-spy-on-american-citizens-for-90-days >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> This appears to say that domestic drone video/data can be kept for >>>> 90 days. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> How long is satellite video/data allowed to be kept? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Isn't a drone a slight higher resolution version of what already >>>> available >>>> >>> via satellite? Is there something more they are doing? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Not arguing, I'm asking. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -Cameron >>>> >>> >>>> >>> ... >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:350598 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
