not sure if this is blocked or not here...but here is a Chicago tribune article...or at least is supposed to be. i got a blank page...,
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-mct-police-apologize-for-not-keeping-council-in-loop-20120503,0,1811700.story On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Eric Roberts < ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > here is the cached page... > http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=drones+used+by+police+departmetns&d=27023553397000195&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=8e681f6a,8d9f59b6 > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Eric Roberts < > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > >> crap...404... >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Eric Roberts < >> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/04/21/2491063/aclu-concerned-about-seattle-police.html >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Eric Roberts < >>> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I would have to look for the story, but i seem to recall hearing about >>>> some police deopartmetns purchasing a drone. It may have been in ref to >>>> immigaration enforcement. I will have to look to be sure. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> what data are we talking about exactly? Now there's a question. Is >>>>> this an advanced version of google maps? With intercept capability? Or >>>>> is there eavesdropping capability as well? >>>>> >>>>> Offhand, I'd choose corporate. I can tell Google to F* off if I so >>>>> choose. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons < >>>>> larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Border patrol wants to use them on the US Canadian border and I >>>>> > believe they are testing unarmed drones, for surveillance only, on >>>>> the >>>>> > Mexican border. >>>>> > >>>>> > Here's a thought experiment, what's better, for the data to be only >>>>> in >>>>> > the hands of corporate or government hands, or available to anyone? >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> good question and I don't know. I wasn't even aware the Air Force >>>>> was >>>>> >> using drones in the US. I find the idea slightly chilling >>>>> considering >>>>> >> how they are used elsewhere. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Cameron Childress < >>>>> camer...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/05/09/1538217/us-air-force-can-accidentally-spy-on-american-citizens-for-90-days >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> This appears to say that domestic drone video/data can be kept for >>>>> 90 days. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> How long is satellite video/data allowed to be kept? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Isn't a drone a slight higher resolution version of what already >>>>> available >>>>> >>> via satellite? Is there something more they are doing? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Not arguing, I'm asking. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> -Cameron >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> ... >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:350600 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
